![]() ![]() Then perhaps the Blade and LAME encoders have more accurate power ![]() Is that the encoder can now take its limited number of bits andĪssign them to the rest of the frequency band. I mentioned before, our ability to hear high frequenciesĭecreases with age. Information is mostly located in the lower frequency bands, and, as The Xing and Fraunhofer encoders almost make it toĢ0 kHz, with FhG just edging out Xing near the 20 kHz mark.Īn encoder throw out everything past 16 kHz? Generally, musical Spikes past the cut-off region (albeit the peaks are small, note In addition, the Blade encoder produces some ugly Units), the Blade and LAME encoders start to cut off the signalĪt 16 kHz. (x-axis is frequency in Hz and the y-axis is power in arbitrary The encoding was done on one channel of the (e.g., energy between 1 and 2 Hz is equal to the energy betweenġ0,000 and 20,000). Which has equal distribution of energy in each frequency octave Signal was one second of pink noise, a pseudo-random wav file Then, I measured eachĮncoder's accuracy by comparing the encoded signals to the original First, I measured the bandwidth of each encoder byĬomparing the power spectra of an encoded test signal. Helpful in understanding an encoder's sound. ![]() Whole story about an encoders audio quality, but they can be 3.61) can beįound as a plug-in for Easy CDDA, which I used for these tests. Now LAME is open source and is actively being improvedīy a community of programmers. They too have become a victim of Fraunhofers encoderĬrackdown. Mike Cheng was the programmer who wrote this port, and, as he mentions on the LAME website, he helped 8Hz with their efforts to speed up the dist10 The LAME encoder started its life as an Amiga port of the dist10 Source code is still available, and theīladeEnc.dll can still be found as a plug-in for some rippersĮncoder, but rather a GPLd patch against the MPEG-ISO NOTE: The binaries for BladeEnc have just been removedįrom Janssons site due to Fraunhofers recentĬrackdown on people distributing encoders based on their For this test I used Bladebatch with BladeEnc.exe The source code is available under the LGPL There are several front endsįor the Blade encoder, e.g., Bladebatch, FrontBlade, RazorBlade (see a ![]() Set out to write Blade in order to increase the processing speed of the reference code It's based on the MPEG-ISO reference source code,ĭist10, which you can download here. AudioCatalyst is what I used for this test.īlade (or BladeEnc) is a freeware encoderīy Tord Jansson. It can be found in big-time ripper/encoders like RealJukeBox Plus, and also in their own product, AudioCatalyst 2.1. The Xing encoder is one of the most popularĮncoding engines because of its speed. Note that theĪudioactive Production Studio does not have a 320 kbs encoding Used Audioactive Production Studio (v1.54). Producer 2, CDDA 4.0, Calkwalk Pro 9, and Audioactive Version of their encoder can be found in programs such as MP3 A demo of an older command line encoder can be found here. They continue to improve theirĪlgorithm and are generally considered to have the benchmarkĮncoder. Player in the development of perceptual-based audio compressionĪlgorithms it's their research in the 1980s that lead to The Fraunhofer Institute has been a major ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |